Browse issues Vol. 30 2018 Vol. 30 No. 4 2018 Vol. 30 No. 3 2018 Vol. 30 No. 2 2018 Vol. 30 No. 1 Vol. 29 2018 Vol. 29 No. 4 2018 Vol. 29 No. 3 2018 Vol. 29 No. 2 2018 Vol. 29 No. 1 Vol. 28 2017 Vol. 28 No. 4 2017 Vol. 28 No. 3 2017 Vol. 28 No. 2 2017 Vol. 28 No. 1 Vol. 27 2017 Vol. 27 No. 4 2017 Vol. 27 No. 3 2017 Vol. 27 No. 2 2017 Vol. 27 No. 1 Vol. 26 2017 Vol. 26 No. 4 2017 Vol. 26 No. 3 2017 Vol. 26 No. 2 2017 Vol. 26 No. 1 Vol. 25 2016 Vol. 25 No. 4 2016 Vol. 25 No. 3 2016 Vol. 25 No. 2 2016 Vol. 25 No. 1 Vol. 24 2016 Vol. 24 No. 4 2016 Vol. 24 No. 3 2016 Vol. 24 No. 2 2016 Vol. 24 No. 1 Vol. 23 2016 Vol. 23 No. 4 2016 Vol. 23 No. 3 2016 Vol. 23 No. 2 2016 Vol. 23 No. 1 Vol. 22 2015 Vol. 22 No. 4 2015 Vol. 22 No. 3 2015 Vol. 22 No. 2 2015 Vol. 22 No. 1 Vol. 21 2015 Vol. 21 No. 4 2015 Vol. 21 No. 3 2015 Vol. 21 No. 2 2015 Vol. 21 No. 1 Vol. 20 2015 Vol. 20 No. 4 2015 Vol. 20 No. 3 2015 Vol. 20 No. 2 2015 Vol. 20 No. 1 Vol. 19 2014 Vol. 19 No. 4 2014 Vol. 19 No. 3 2014 Vol. 19 No. 2 2014 Vol. 19 No. 1 Vol. 18 2014 Vol. 18 No. 4 2014 Vol. 18 No. 3 2014 Vol. 18 No. 2 2014 Vol. 18 No. 1 Vol. 17 2014 Vol. 17 No. 4 2014 Vol. 17 No. 3 2014 Vol. 17 No. 2 2014 Vol. 17 No. 1 Vol. 16 2013 Vol. 16 No. 4 2013 Vol. 16 No. 3 2013 Vol. 16 No. 2 2013 Vol. 16 No. 1 Vol. 15 2013 Vol. 15 No. 4 2013 Vol. 15 No. 3 2013 Vol. 15 No. 2 2013 Vol. 15 No. 1 Vol. 14 2013 Vol. 14 No. 4 2013 Vol. 14 No. 3 2013 Vol. 14 No. 2 2013 Vol. 14 No. 1 Vol. 13 2012 Vol. 13 No. 4 2012 Vol. 13 No. 3 2012 Vol. 13 No. 2 2012 Vol. 13 No. 1 Vol. 12 2012 Vol. 12 No. 4 2012 Vol. 12 No. 3 2012 Vol. 12 No. 2 2012 Vol. 12 No. 1 Vol. 11 2012 Vol. 11 No. 4 2012 Vol. 11 No. 3 2012 Vol. 11 No. 2 2012 Vol. 11 No. 1 Vol. 10 2011 Vol. 10 No. 4 2011 Vol. 10 No. 3 2011 Vol. 10 No. 2 2011 Vol. 10 No. 1 Vol. 9 2011 Vol. 9 No. 4 2011 Vol. 9 No. 3 2011 Vol. 9 No. 2 2011 Vol. 9 No. 1 Vol. 8 2011 Vol. 8 No. 4 2011 Vol. 8 No. 3 2011 Vol. 8 No. 2 2011 Vol. 8 No. 1 Vol. 7 2010 Vol. 7 No. 4 2010 Vol. 7 No. 3 2010 Vol. 7 No. 2 2010 Vol. 7 No. 1 Vol. 6 2010 Vol. 6 No. 4 2010 Vol. 6 No. 3 2010 Vol. 6 No. 2 2010 Vol. 6 No. 1 Vol. 5 2009 Vol. 5 No. 6 2009 Vol. 5 No. 5 2009 Vol. 5 No. 4 2009 Vol. 5 No. 3 2009 Vol. 5 No. 2 2009 Vol. 5 No. 1 Vol. 4 2008 Vol. 4 No. 6 2008 Vol. 4 No. 5 2008 Vol. 4 No. 4 2008 Vol. 4 No. 3 2008 Vol. 4 No. 2 2008 Vol. 4 No. 1 Vol. 3 2007 Vol. 3 No. 4 2007 Vol. 3 No. 3 2007 Vol. 3 No. 2 2007 Vol. 3 No. 1 Vol. 2 2006 Vol. 2 No. 4 2006 Vol. 2 No. 3 2006 Vol. 2 No. 2 2006 Vol. 2 No. 1 Vol. 1 2005 Vol. 1 No. 4 2005 Vol. 1 No. 3 2005 Vol. 1 No. 2 2005 Vol. 1 No. 1 International Journal of Services and Operations Management2009 Vol. 5 No. 3 PagesTitle and authors275-298An exploratory study on contextual variables and manufacturing efficiencyRoberto Sarmiento, Mike Byrne, Jo Beale, Graeme Knowles DOI: 10.1504/IJSOM.2009.024148299-325The implications of forecast accuracy on the benefits of online auctions in business-to-business and business-to-consumer environmentsTim Baker, Nagesh N. MurthyDOI: 10.1504/IJSOM.2009.024149326-349The evaluation of manufacturing systems using concordance and disconcordance propertiesAteekh-Ur Rehman, A. Subash BabuDOI: 10.1504/IJSOM.2009.024150350-374The behavioural causes of the bullwhip effect: breaking the mouldT.T. Niranjan, Bhimaraya A. Metri, Vijay AggarwalDOI: 10.1504/IJSOM.2009.024151375-401A multi-agent system architecture for business-to-business applicationsPaolo RennaDOI: 10.1504/IJSOM.2009.024152402-427Benchmarking supply chains on risk dimensionsMohd Nishat FaisalDOI: 10.1504/IJSOM.2009.024153
