Browse issues Vol. 9 2016 Vol. 9 No. 1 Vol. 8 2015 Vol. 8 No. 3/4 2015 Vol. 8 No. 1/2 Vol. 7 2014 Vol. 7 No. 3/4 2014 Vol. 7 No. 1/2 Vol. 6 2013 Vol. 6 No. 4 2013 Vol. 6 No. 3 2013 Vol. 6 No. 1/2 Vol. 5 2012 Vol. 5 No. 3/4 2012 Vol. 5 No. 2 2012 Vol. 5 No. 1 Vol. 4 2011 Vol. 4 No. 4 2011 Vol. 4 No. 3 2010 Vol. 4 No. 1/2 Vol. 3 2009 Vol. 3 No. 4 2009 Vol. 3 No. 3 2009 Vol. 3 No. 2 2009 Vol. 3 No. 1 Vol. 2 2008 Vol. 2 No. 4 2008 Vol. 2 No. 3 2008 Vol. 2 No. 2 2008 Vol. 2 No. 1 Vol. 1 2007 Vol. 1 No. 4 2007 Vol. 1 No. 3 2006 Vol. 1 No. 1/2 International Journal of Intellectual Property Management2011 Vol. 4 No. 4 PagesTitle and authors211-219Unveiling the technology: a case study for cellular mobile phonesRanjeet Kumar; R.C. Tripathi; M.D. Tiwari DOI: 10.1504/IJIPM.2011.043871220-238How agricultural biotechnology scientists perceive intellectual property rights (IPRs) and their implications: insights from developing AsiaJane Payumo; Howard Grimes; Keith JonesDOI: 10.1504/IJIPM.2011.043872239-269Optimal negotiated transfer pricing and its implications for international transfer pricing of intangiblesPeter C. Dawson; Stephen M. MillerDOI: 10.1504/IJIPM.2011.043874270-282Granted patents have the same level of inventive step? A new approach to distinguish patent protection based on the level of inventive stepYoshitoshi Tanaka; Daphne Jue WangDOI: 10.1504/IJIPM.2011.043879283-296The capability of intellectual property disputes of being settled by ADR: theoretical and practical approach under Jordanian lawL.M. Daradkeh; Ala Elden KasawnehDOI: 10.1504/IJIPM.2011.043880297-306Polymorph patents; how strong they are really?Prasad VureDOI: 10.1504/IJIPM.2011.043875
