Browse issues Vol. 32 2018 Vol. 32 No. 2 2018 Vol. 32 No. 1 Vol. 31 2018 Vol. 31 No. 4 2018 Vol. 31 No. 3 2018 Vol. 31 No. 2 2018 Vol. 31 No. 1 Vol. 30 2017 Vol. 30 No. 4 2017 Vol. 30 No. 3 2017 Vol. 30 No. 2 2017 Vol. 30 No. 1 Vol. 29 2017 Vol. 29 No. 4 2017 Vol. 29 No. 3 2017 Vol. 29 No. 2 2017 Vol. 29 No. 1 Vol. 28 2017 Vol. 28 No. 4 2017 Vol. 28 No. 3 2017 Vol. 28 No. 2 2017 Vol. 28 No. 1 Vol. 27 2016 Vol. 27 No. 4 2016 Vol. 27 No. 3 2016 Vol. 27 No. 1/2 Vol. 26 2016 Vol. 26 No. 4 2016 Vol. 26 No. 3 2016 Vol. 26 No. 2 2016 Vol. 26 No. 1 Vol. 25 2016 Vol. 25 No. 4 2016 Vol. 25 No. 3 2016 Vol. 25 No. 2 2016 Vol. 25 No. 1 Vol. 24 2015 Vol. 24 No. 4 2015 Vol. 24 No. 3 2015 Vol. 24 No. 2 2015 Vol. 24 No. 1 Vol. 23 2015 Vol. 23 No. 4 2015 Vol. 23 No. 3 2015 Vol. 23 No. 2 2015 Vol. 23 No. 1 Vol. 22 2015 Vol. 22 No. 4 2015 Vol. 22 No. 3 2015 Vol. 22 No. 2 2015 Vol. 22 No. 1 Vol. 21 2014 Vol. 21 No. 4 2014 Vol. 21 No. 3 2014 Vol. 21 No. 2 2014 Vol. 21 No. 1 Vol. 20 2014 Vol. 20 No. 4 2014 Vol. 20 No. 3 2014 Vol. 20 No. 2 2014 Vol. 20 No. 1 Vol. 19 2014 Vol. 19 No. 4 2014 Vol. 19 No. 3 2014 Vol. 19 No. 2 2014 Vol. 19 No. 1 Vol. 18 2013 Vol. 18 No. 4 2013 Vol. 18 No. 3 2013 Vol. 18 No. 2 2013 Vol. 18 No. 1 Vol. 17 2013 Vol. 17 No. 4 2013 Vol. 17 No. 3 2013 Vol. 17 No. 2 2013 Vol. 17 No. 1 Vol. 16 2013 Vol. 16 No. 4 2013 Vol. 16 No. 3 2013 Vol. 16 No. 2 2013 Vol. 16 No. 1 Vol. 15 2012 Vol. 15 No. 4 2012 Vol. 15 No. 3 2012 Vol. 15 No. 2 2012 Vol. 15 No. 1 Vol. 14 2012 Vol. 14 No. 4 2012 Vol. 14 No. 3 2012 Vol. 14 No. 2 2012 Vol. 14 No. 1 Vol. 13 2012 Vol. 13 No. 4 2012 Vol. 13 No. 3 2012 Vol. 13 No. 2 2012 Vol. 13 No. 1 Vol. 12 2011 Vol. 12 No. 4 2011 Vol. 12 No. 3 2011 Vol. 12 No. 2 2011 Vol. 12 No. 1 Vol. 11 2011 Vol. 11 No. 4 2011 Vol. 11 No. 3 2011 Vol. 11 No. 2 2011 Vol. 11 No. 1 Vol. 10 2011 Vol. 10 No. 4 2011 Vol. 10 No. 3 2011 Vol. 10 No. 2 2011 Vol. 10 No. 1 Vol. 9 2010 Vol. 9 No. 4 2010 Vol. 9 No. 3 2010 Vol. 9 No. 2 2010 Vol. 9 No. 1 Vol. 8 2010 Vol. 8 No. 4 2010 Vol. 8 No. 3 2010 Vol. 8 No. 2 2010 Vol. 8 No. 1 Vol. 7 2010 Vol. 7 No. 4 2010 Vol. 7 No. 3 2010 Vol. 7 No. 2 2010 Vol. 7 No. 1 Vol. 6 2009 Vol. 6 No. 4 2009 Vol. 6 No. 3 2009 Vol. 6 No. 2 2009 Vol. 6 No. 1 Vol. 5 2009 Vol. 5 No. 4 2009 Vol. 5 No. 3 2009 Vol. 5 No. 2 2009 Vol. 5 No. 1 Vol. 4 2009 Vol. 4 No. 4 2009 Vol. 4 No. 3 2009 Vol. 4 No. 2 2009 Vol. 4 No. 1 Vol. 3 2008 Vol. 3 No. 6 2008 Vol. 3 No. 5 2008 Vol. 3 No. 4 2008 Vol. 3 No. 3 2008 Vol. 3 No. 1/2 Vol. 2 2007 Vol. 2 No. 4 2007 Vol. 2 No. 3 2007 Vol. 2 No. 2 2007 Vol. 2 No. 1 Vol. 1 2006 Vol. 1 No. 4 2006 Vol. 1 No. 3 2005 Vol. 1 No. 1/2 International Journal of Operational Research2018 Vol. 31 No. 2 PagesTitle and authors141-163Single-vendor single-buyer optimal consignment policy with generic demand distribution by considering some realistic factorsS.M. Shahidul Islam; Mohammad Abdul Hoque DOI: 10.1504/IJOR.2018.10009797164-197Semi-infinite minimax fractional programming under (Φ, ρ)-V-invexity and generalised (Φ, ρ)-V-invexity. OptimalityTadeusz AntczakDOI: 10.1504/IJOR.2018.10009798198-223Two techniques for solving nonlinear decreasing demand inventory system with shortage backordersRirin Diar Astanti; The Jin Ai; Hunyh Trung Luong; Hui-Ming WeeDOI: 10.1504/IJOR.2018.10009799224-244A methodological approach to assess the content of work in air cargo operationsRossella Pozzi; Carlo Noè; Tommaso RossiDOI: 10.1504/IJOR.2018.10009800245-261Supply chain system for time and quality dependent decaying items with multiple market demand and volume flexibilitySurbhi Singhal; S.R. SinghDOI: 10.1504/IJOR.2018.10009801262-280An inventory model for deteriorating items with constant, linear and quadratic holding cost - a comparative study in third order equationC. Krishnamoorthi; V. ChoudriDOI: 10.1504/IJOR.2018.10009802
