Authors: Ewa Dziwok
Addresses: Department of Applied Mathematics, University of Economics in Katowice, 1 Maja 50, Katowice, 40-287, Poland
Abstract: Greater globalisation and an increasing role of financial markets have a significant impact on the banking industry and the operational risk management (ORM) process. The Basel Committee on Banking Supervision (BCBS) started to underline the importance of operational risk category and the capital requirements for the losses connected with operational risk (Basel II). Last financial crisis, which had enormous impact on financial markets caused the implementation of Basel III norms concerning regulatory capital requirements. The aim of this paper is to compare and assess different approaches for modelling an operational risk: the basic indicator approach (BIA) and the standardised approach (TSA), including its variant - the alternative standardised approach (ASA). The novelty of our approach lies in the critical analysis of these approaches from the viewpoint of capital measurement for operational risk.
Keywords: financial institutions; operational risk; capital requirements; financial regulations.
International Journal of Trade and Global Markets, 2018 Vol.11 No.4, pp.259 - 269
Received: 13 Dec 2017
Accepted: 02 Sep 2018
Published online: 01 Jan 2019 *