Title: Hot spots in animal agriculture, emerging federal environmental policies and the potential for efficiency and innovation offsets

Authors: Ada Wossink, Frank Wefering

Addresses: North Carolina State University, Department of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Campus Box 8109, Raleigh, NC 27695, USA. ' Rupprecht Consult, Forschung & Beratung GmbH, Waltheest. 49-51, 51069 Cologne, Germany

Abstract: In North America and Northern Europe, high livestock densities in concentrated areas (hot spots) have led to manure surpluses, which have resulted in water pollution problems. Using the emerging policy objectives for animal waste in the European Union and the USA as a backdrop, this paper discusses the impact of environmental regulation on farm profits. A theoretical model of the farm is presented where pollution is a joint output of production and where inefficiency in production prevails. Given this assumption, environmental regulations affect both the level of inefficiency and the extent of technological change and can induce cost offsets. Data from the Netherlands, where strict environmental regulation has been in place for animal agriculture since 1987, are used to test the hypothesis about efficiency and innovation offsets. Furthermore, differences in these offsets between farm types are assessed.

Keywords: animal agriculture; efficiency offsets; environmental policy; innovation offsets; Porter hypothesis.

DOI: 10.1504/IJARGE.2003.003970

International Journal of Agricultural Resources, Governance and Ecology, 2003 Vol.2 No.3/4, pp.228 - 242

Published online: 10 May 2004 *

Full-text access for editors Full-text access for subscribers Purchase this article Comment on this article