Title: Benchmarking and reengineering: alternatives or partners?

Authors: Carl G. Thor, Joyce R. Jarrett

Addresses: JarrettThor International Inc., 7285 S. Union Street, Alexandria, VA 22314, USA. JarrettThor International Inc., 7285 S. Union Street, Alexandria, VA 22314, USA

Abstract: Both Benchmarking and Reengineering are widely practised around the world, but they are not often found together. They sound quite different to the untrained ear. Benchmarking sounds like a heavily intellectual exercise to generate more realistic goals, many good anecdotes, and an occasional good idea. Reengineering sounds like the management equivalent of slash-and-burn agriculture; major downsizings are made in operations under the banner of better customer services. Actually, the two techniques have much in common, and reengineering can greatly benefit from integration with benchmarking. The benefit comes mainly in two areas: (1) targeting the processes to reengineer is done better guided by systematic benchmarking studies than through casual or arbitrary selection by executives or consultants and (2) reengineering|s technique of creating a new customer-oriented approach through use of mainly internal thinking would be greatly enhanced by systematic input of benchmarking partners| experience.

Keywords: benchmarking; reengineering; goal-setting; process mapping; strategic planning; productivity; customer satisfaction; quality.

DOI: 10.1504/IJTM.1999.002752

International Journal of Technology Management, 1999 Vol.17 No.7/8, pp.786-796

Available online: 06 Jul 2003 *

Full-text access for editors Access for subscribers Purchase this article Comment on this article