Characterising the choice environment: feeling constrained as an impediment to happiness
by Katherine Guthrie; Jan Sokolowsky
International Journal of Happiness and Development (IJHD), Vol. 1, No. 3, 2013

Abstract: We posit that happiness reflects not only utility from realised choices, but also discontentment from having to forego alternatives. Under this view, utility and happiness maximisation yield the same optimal choices in a variety of standard economic decision problems, but utility and happiness can move in opposite directions when the choice set changes. Our theory: 1) respects economists' and psychologists' notions of utility and happiness; 2) captures why the two concepts are often confused; 3) explains the Easterlin Paradox without resorting to systematically poor choices; 4) offers a novel interpretation of previous empirical findings in which individuals' choices go hand-in-hand with lower happiness.

Online publication date: Sat, 19-Jul-2014

The full text of this article is only available to individual subscribers or to users at subscribing institutions.

 
Existing subscribers:
Go to Inderscience Online Journals to access the Full Text of this article.

Pay per view:
If you are not a subscriber and you just want to read the full contents of this article, buy online access here.

Complimentary Subscribers, Editors or Members of the Editorial Board of the International Journal of Happiness and Development (IJHD):
Login with your Inderscience username and password:

Username:        Password:          Forgotten your password?

Want to subscribe?
A subscription gives you complete access to all articles in the current issue, as well as to all articles in the previous three years (where applicable). See our Orders page to subscribe.

If you still need assistance, please email subs@inderscience.com