Bank's post-notice obligations in the documentary credits under UCP600 Online publication date: Fri, 29-Nov-2013
by Jingbo Zhang
International Journal of Private Law (IJPL), Vol. 6, No. 2, 2013
Abstract: This paper aims to systematically analyse the bank's post-notice obligations in a documentary credit under the framework of UCP600. The paper not only reviews the recent developments in the English court - Fortis Bank & Stemcor v Indian Overseas Bank ([2010] EWHC 84 (Comm); [2011] EWCA Civ 58; [2011] EWHC (Comm) 538), but also examines the methods adopted by the courts to interpret the UCP provisions. Meanwhile, in relation to this case, other useful methods which may effectively explain the bank's obligations are also referred to in this paper. In addition, the paper addresses other important issues concerning the bank's post-notice obligations which are partly ignored by the UCP and the case law, such as the condition of the returned documents. Moreover, some feasible suggestions are put forward in this paper relating to each aspect of the bank's obligations, so as to achieve the purpose of supplementing this incomplete area under UCP600 as well as directing the market practitioners.
Existing subscribers:
Go to Inderscience Online Journals to access the Full Text of this article.
If you are not a subscriber and you just want to read the full contents of this article, buy online access here.Complimentary Subscribers, Editors or Members of the Editorial Board of the International Journal of Private Law (IJPL):
Login with your Inderscience username and password:
Want to subscribe?
A subscription gives you complete access to all articles in the current issue, as well as to all articles in the previous three years (where applicable). See our Orders page to subscribe.
If you still need assistance, please email subs@inderscience.com
Our Blog 
Follow us on Twitter 
Visit us on Facebook