'Sovereign choices'. Some critical remarks on the Wightman judgment of the court of justice
by Giuseppe Martinico
International Journal of Human Rights and Constitutional Studies (IJHRCS), Vol. 6, No. 4, 2019

Abstract: On 10 December 2018, the CJEU delivered the Wightman judgment where, among other things, it recognised the revocability of the notification ex Art. 50 TEU, confirming, in this way, more or less what Advocate General Campos Sánchez-Bordona had suggested in his opinion. This piece is divided into two parts. In the first part of the article, I shall comment upon the idea of legal integration presented by the CJEU in this judgment and in so doing I shall represent the EU as a complex legal system. In the second part of the article, I shall offer a critical view of the legal reasoning of the Court.

Online publication date: Fri, 27-Sep-2019

The full text of this article is only available to individual subscribers or to users at subscribing institutions.

 
Existing subscribers:
Go to Inderscience Online Journals to access the Full Text of this article.

Pay per view:
If you are not a subscriber and you just want to read the full contents of this article, buy online access here.

Complimentary Subscribers, Editors or Members of the Editorial Board of the International Journal of Human Rights and Constitutional Studies (IJHRCS):
Login with your Inderscience username and password:

Username:        Password:          Forgotten your password?

Want to subscribe?
A subscription gives you complete access to all articles in the current issue, as well as to all articles in the previous three years (where applicable). See our Orders page to subscribe.

If you still need assistance, please email subs@inderscience.com