Sharing is caring vs. stealing is wrong: a moral argument for limiting copyright protection Online publication date: Mon, 17-Jul-2017
by Julian Hauser
International Journal of Technology Policy and Law (IJTPL), Vol. 3, No. 1, 2017
Abstract: Copyright is at the centre of both popular and academic debate. That emotions are running high is hardly surprising - copyright influences who contributes what to culture, how culture is used, and even the kind of persons we are and come to be. Consequentialist, Lockean, and personality interest accounts are generally advanced in the literature to morally justify copyright law. I argue that these approaches fail to ground extensive authorial rights in intellectual creations and that only a small subset of the rights accorded by copyright law is justified. The pared-down version of copyright that I defend consists of the right to attribution, the right to have one's non-endorsement of modifications or uses of one's work explicitly noted, and the right to a share of the profit resulting from the commercial uses of one's work. I also cursorily explore whether contribution to another person's work gives rise to moral interests.
Online publication date: Mon, 17-Jul-2017
If you are not a subscriber and you just want to read the full contents of this article, buy online access here.Complimentary Subscribers, Editors or Members of the Editorial Board of the International Journal of Technology Policy and Law (IJTPL):
Login with your Inderscience username and password:
Want to subscribe?
A subscription gives you complete access to all articles in the current issue, as well as to all articles in the previous three years (where applicable). See our Orders page to subscribe.
If you still need assistance, please email email@example.com