Rationality of the capital market: capitalistic system vs. Islamic system Online publication date: Tue, 15-Mar-2016
by Md. Mahmudul Alam; Chowdhury Shahed Akbar
International Journal of Behavioural Accounting and Finance (IJBAF), Vol. 5, No. 3/4, 2015
Abstract: Efficient market hypothesis (EMH) is founded on the theory of expected rationality but the theory of behavioural finance concludes that stock market investors are quasi-rational. Therefore, under the capitalistic system, the efficient markets have already failed to protect the rights of investors that have led to chronic capital market crashes and failure to achieve efficiency, justice, fairness, accountability, fair distribution of benefits, and a rational behaviour among investors. However, recently, Islamic financial institutions and markets have been emerging, which stand on the Shariah provision - the guided way to behave rationally or guided rationality. Based on the empirical experiences and evidences of both market systems, this paper discusses and compares the performances of the markets under the theoretical arguments of 'rationality', 'quasi-rationality', and 'guided rationality'. This paper suggests that capital market based on guided rationality under the Islamic System can be a better alternative over the conventional market system.
Online publication date: Tue, 15-Mar-2016
If you are not a subscriber and you just want to read the full contents of this article, buy online access here.Complimentary Subscribers, Editors or Members of the Editorial Board of the International Journal of Behavioural Accounting and Finance (IJBAF):
Login with your Inderscience username and password:
Want to subscribe?
A subscription gives you complete access to all articles in the current issue, as well as to all articles in the previous three years (where applicable). See our Orders page to subscribe.
If you still need assistance, please email firstname.lastname@example.org