Transactions, power and contested exchange: towards a theory of exchange in business relationships
by Andrew Cox
International Journal of Procurement Management (IJPM), Vol. 1, No. 1/2, 2007

Abstract: Notwithstanding Williamson's view that current definitions of power are overreliant on resource-dependency arguments and tautological, it is argued that it is possible to develop a theoretically robust and empirically rigorous reconceptualisation of power in business transactions. This requires an understanding of the commensurability of the objective interests of transaction partners, and a more detailed specification of the structural and cognitive power resources available to shape contractual outcomes asymmetrically, in horizontal and vertical business relationships. It is argued that exchange can be both contested and uncontested, but power is only relevant when exchange is contested. When power is exerted it is possible to conceptualise three dimensions of power and leverage in business and economic transactions, and this provides the starting point for a theory of exchange in business relationships.

Online publication date: Wed, 10-Oct-2007

The full text of this article is only available to individual subscribers or to users at subscribing institutions.

 
Existing subscribers:
Go to Inderscience Online Journals to access the Full Text of this article.

Pay per view:
If you are not a subscriber and you just want to read the full contents of this article, buy online access here.

Complimentary Subscribers, Editors or Members of the Editorial Board of the International Journal of Procurement Management (IJPM):
Login with your Inderscience username and password:

Username:        Password:          Forgotten your password?

Want to subscribe?
A subscription gives you complete access to all articles in the current issue, as well as to all articles in the previous three years (where applicable). See our Orders page to subscribe.

If you still need assistance, please email subs@inderscience.com