Drone attacks during armed conflict: quest for legality and regulation Online publication date: Tue, 10-Oct-2023
by Mohammad Bitar; Benarji Chakka
International Journal of Intellectual Property Management (IJIPM), Vol. 13, No. 3/4, 2023
Abstract: With the advancement of new technologies, drones are now extensively employed in combat operations, unlike surveillance, where it is causing greater violations than expected. Drones reduce human losses and ensure precision target strikes, say advocates. Most modern conflicts occur in metropolitan areas, such as Libya, Syria, Afghanistan, and Ukraine, where civilians and military forces coexist without conforming to IHL. Combatant drone operators struggle to identify and attack targets using technology that respects differentiation. Drones cannot tell protected items from allowed targets. This article examines the legality of drone strikes under IHL and the permitted range of their use to controls and constraints that can be implemented to guarantee drone attacks are legitimate under existing law. Drones are not innately unlawful and are 85.96% accurate in attacks. Determining whether drones obey IHL requires a subjective analysis of each situation. This article is theological research based on primary and secondary sources. The essay supports a treaty restricting drone usage in armed conflicts.
Existing subscribers:
Go to Inderscience Online Journals to access the Full Text of this article.
If you are not a subscriber and you just want to read the full contents of this article, buy online access here.Complimentary Subscribers, Editors or Members of the Editorial Board of the International Journal of Intellectual Property Management (IJIPM):
Login with your Inderscience username and password:
Want to subscribe?
A subscription gives you complete access to all articles in the current issue, as well as to all articles in the previous three years (where applicable). See our Orders page to subscribe.
If you still need assistance, please email subs@inderscience.com