A comparative study for balancing and positioning of an inverted pendulum robot using model-based controllers Online publication date: Mon, 25-Oct-2021
by Jasem Tamimi
International Journal of Mechatronics and Automation (IJMA), Vol. 8, No. 3, 2021
Abstract: This paper presents a comparison between four control approaches to solve the problem of balancing and positioning of the inverted pendulum robot (IPR). These control approaches are proportional-integral-derivative (PID), linear quadratic tracker (LQT), linear model predictive control (LMPC) and nonlinear model predictive control (NMPC). The first three approaches directly depend on the linear control theory and thus on the dynamic linearisation around the stationary point. However, the last control approach depends on the original nonlinear dynamics, therefore, a superior control performance is obtained here. In this study, we test the IPR using these control approaches. In particular, these control approaches are simulated using Simulink/MATLAB dedicated toolboxes like optimal control toolbox and MPC toolbox to test the linear control approach, in addition, a combined multiple shooting with collocation on finite elements method for nonlinear approach. Moreover, some of these scenarios are tested experimentally using a simple lab-made prototype.
Existing subscribers:
Go to Inderscience Online Journals to access the Full Text of this article.
If you are not a subscriber and you just want to read the full contents of this article, buy online access here.Complimentary Subscribers, Editors or Members of the Editorial Board of the International Journal of Mechatronics and Automation (IJMA):
Login with your Inderscience username and password:
Want to subscribe?
A subscription gives you complete access to all articles in the current issue, as well as to all articles in the previous three years (where applicable). See our Orders page to subscribe.
If you still need assistance, please email subs@inderscience.com