Convention on Nuclear Safety: lessons learned after the third round of review meetings Online publication date: Sat, 06-May-2006
by Ales Skraban
International Journal of Nuclear Law (IJNUCL), Vol. 1, No. 1, 2006
Abstract: As the Convention on Nuclear Safety was adopted in mid-1994 and came into existence in late 1996, and because the third review meeting has recently been organised, an attempt to draw some conclusions is justifiable. The Convention is an instrument of incentive character, and Slovenia understands the interface between the review process and national reports as a lesson learned and a self-assessment exercise rather than purely reporting obligations towards other Contracting Parties. Fifty-five parties to the Convention can prove the presumption of its universality. The focus of this paper is mostly on a demonstration of possible progress achieved. The phenomenon of 'high level of safety' will be discussed in such a way to compare some statistical facts and to emphasise some substantial issues on the international as well as on national level. This paper presents a comparison among all three review meetings with respect to the number and structure of questions to different articles of the Convention and main observations on factors of special interest, as reproduced in Summary Reports after each review meeting. This paper also covers the experience gained by Slovenia throughout this period.
Online publication date: Sat, 06-May-2006
If you are not a subscriber and you just want to read the full contents of this article, buy online access here.Complimentary Subscribers, Editors or Members of the Editorial Board of the International Journal of Nuclear Law (IJNUCL):
Login with your Inderscience username and password:
Want to subscribe?
A subscription gives you complete access to all articles in the current issue, as well as to all articles in the previous three years (where applicable). See our Orders page to subscribe.
If you still need assistance, please email email@example.com