Is there a difference between well-informed laypersons' and auditors' perceptions of auditor independence? Hong Kong evidence Online publication date: Tue, 21-Oct-2014
by Philip Law, Adrian Lei
International Journal of Accounting and Finance (IJAF), Vol. 3, No. 1, 2011
Abstract: Perceptions of auditor independence have become fundamental to public confidence in financial reporting and audit assurances. The lack of research on this issue in the Hong Kong auditing environment motivates the empirical study. The enactment of appropriate auditing standards in the marketplace could suitably serve the public interest and regulate the profession. Results show that provision of non-audit services (NAS) and high competition could have a negative affect on perceptions of independence. There is no difference in perception ratings between CPA-certified auditors and trainee auditors. Auditors perceive that NAS provision has a significantly more adverse influence on independence than laypersons do. Results imply that the theory of audit expectation gap still exists in the post-Enron audit environment. The Hong Kong regulatory body should consider professional reforms, such as the prohibition of NAS. Internationally, the study would be of interest to those doing business in China and Hong Kong.
Existing subscribers:
Go to Inderscience Online Journals to access the Full Text of this article.
If you are not a subscriber and you just want to read the full contents of this article, buy online access here.Complimentary Subscribers, Editors or Members of the Editorial Board of the International Journal of Accounting and Finance (IJAF):
Login with your Inderscience username and password:
Want to subscribe?
A subscription gives you complete access to all articles in the current issue, as well as to all articles in the previous three years (where applicable). See our Orders page to subscribe.
If you still need assistance, please email subs@inderscience.com
Our Blog 
Follow us on Twitter 
Visit us on Facebook