Title: Assessment of product-service systems for increasing the energy efficiency of compressed air systems

Authors: Ute Weißfloch; Jutta Geldermann

Addresses: Fraunhofer Institute for Systems and Innovation Research ISI, Breslauer Strasse 48, 76139 Karlsruhe, Germany ' Georg-August University Göttingen, Platz der Göttinger Sieben 3, 37073 Göttingen, Germany

Abstract: Energy-optimised system operations should be a cornerstone for cleaner production in industry. However, the high energy consumption of compressed air systems (CASs) is often ignored. Product-service systems (PSSs) represent a method to improve energy efficiency, but can only be successful if they offer a win-win situation for both parties, namely the supplier and the customer. When selecting the most appropriate PSS, different quantitative or qualitative criteria have to be taken into account. Asymmetric information and differing objectives between the supplier and the user of a technology, characterise this decision problem. Like the two sides of a coin, investment in an energy-efficient production technology is judged differently by the manufacturer than by the customer. This paper presents a new approach offering multi-criteria group decision support based on the PROMETHEE method, which clearly depicts conflicting targets of decision-makers, and thus supports articulating criteria, preferences and weights of various stakeholders. This method was applied in a case study evaluating different concepts of leakage management, which were compared to the traditional business concept - acquisition and use of the compressed air system by the end-user. Within the context of the decision problem of choosing a best CAS, some further methodological developments are proposed. [Received 8 November 2014; Revised 31 August 2015; Accepted 29 December 2015]

Keywords: product-service systems; PSSs; compressed air systems; energy efficiency; multicriteria decision making; MCDM; conflicting objectives; cleaner production; group decision making; PROMETHEE; leakage management; stakeholders.

DOI: 10.1504/EJIE.2016.076383

European Journal of Industrial Engineering, 2016 Vol.10 No.3, pp.341 - 366

Received: 08 May 2021
Accepted: 12 May 2021

Published online: 05 May 2016 *

Full-text access for editors Access for subscribers Purchase this article Comment on this article