Authors: Maximilian Von Grafenstein; Wolfgang Schulz
Addresses: Alexander von Humboldt Institute for Internet and Society (HIIG), Oberwallstraße 9, 10117, Berlin, Germany ' Hans-Bredow-Institut für Medienforschung, Lehrstuhl für Medienrecht und Öffentliches Recht einschließlich ihrer theoretischen Grundlagen, Rothenbaumchaussee 36 20148, Hamburg, Germany
Abstract: Article 17 of the final draft of the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) establishes the so-called 'right to be forgotten'. The provision reacts and relates to the decision by the European Court of Justice in the case of Google Spain v Mr. González on the 'right to be de-listed' from an internet search engine. The decision in this case, and the final draft of the GDPR, both raise fundamental questions regarding the concept of protection of the corresponding fundamental rights and how the GDPR should be interpreted pursuant to these rights. This paper proposes a method of interpreting fundamental rights by referring not only to ontological categories such as 'personal data' per se but also - more normatively - to their substantial guarantees. It is our belief that this approach helps to differentiate precisely between several fundamental rights that are applicable in the case, such as the right to privacy of Article 7 CFR and data protection under Article 8 CFR, and balance them against opposing fundamental rights.
Keywords: right to be forgotten; right to be de-listed; right to data protection; right to private life; European Charter of Fundamental Rights; interpretation; data protection regulation; data protection instruments; regulatory instruments; privacy protection.
International Journal of Public Law and Policy, 2015 Vol.5 No.3, pp.249 - 269
Received: 08 May 2021
Accepted: 12 May 2021
Published online: 01 Mar 2016 *