Title: Analysis of regulatory guidance values for six commonly regulated chlorophenols

Authors: Michelle A. Hummel; Aaron A. Jennings

Addresses: Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of California, Berkeley, 760 Davis Hall, 94720-1710, USA ' Department of Civil Engineering, Case Western Reserve University, 10900 Euclid Ave, Bingham Building, Room 208, Cleveland, OH 44106, USA

Abstract: Regulatory guidance values (RGVs) are developed by regulators to protect human health by establishing maximum allowable contaminant concentrations. Contamination of residential surface soil is of particular concern because of its potential impact on the general population, especially children. As part of an ongoing examination of soil RGVs, this study analyses guidance values applied to chlorophenols, a class of chemicals used as pesticides, herbicides, and disinfectants. Chlorophenol RGVs have been promulgated by at least 45 US states, 38 United Nations member states, four Native American tribes, five federal agencies, and several city, county, and territorial jurisdictions. An analysis of the six most commonly regulated chlorophenols (2-chlorophenol, 2,4-dichlorophenol, 2,4,5-trichlorophenol, 2,4,6-trichlorophenol, 2,3,4,6-tetrachlorophenol, and pentachlorophenol) demonstrates that there is great variability in the guidance values, which vary by six to eight orders of magnitude and have distributions similar to those of lognormal random variables. Clearly, there is little universal agreement on the appropriate maximum contamination levels for chlorophenols.

Keywords: chlorophenols; dichlorophenol; trichlorophenol; tetrachlorophenol; pentachlorophenol; regulatory guidance values; RGVs; residential surface soils; maximum contamination levels; cancer risk; soil standards; health protection; pesticides; herbicides; disinfectants.

DOI: 10.1504/IJEE.2015.074925

International Journal of Environmental Engineering, 2015 Vol.7 No.3/4, pp.236 - 274

Received: 10 Nov 2014
Accepted: 01 Oct 2015

Published online: 24 Feb 2016 *

Full-text access for editors Access for subscribers Purchase this article Comment on this article