Article: Including non-trade concerns: the environment in EU and US agricultural policy Journal: International Journal of Agricultural Resources, Governance and Ecology (IJARGE) 2005 Vol.4 No.3/4 pp.262 - 276 Abstract: The challenge for any trade agreement is to be adaptable enough to enable countries to address legitimate non-trade concerns (NTC) while being restrictive enough to limit harm to other countries and to assist the creation of free international markets. In this paper, we focus on how environmental NTC have been addressed in agricultural policy in the USA and the European Union (EU) and the resulting implications for trade agreements. For example, programmes in the USA discourage production on environmentally sensitive land, while the EU encourages extensive production. While these and other differences will affect production and trade, the different approaches to agri-environmental policy affect the degree to which the two regions can use agri-environmental policy to offset commodity payments. This difference in flexibility will, in turn, affect how easily the two regions can accept a trade agreement that mandates greater reductions in trade-distorting price supports. Inderscience Publishers - linking academia, business and industry through research

Title: Including non-trade concerns: the environment in EU and US agricultural policy

Authors: Kathy Baylis, Gordon C. Rausser, Leo K. Simon

Addresses: Food and Resource Economics, 341–2357 Main Mall, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, B.C. V6T 1Z4, Canada. ' Department of Agricultural and Resource Economics, 207 Giannini Hall, University of California, Berkeley, CA 94720–3310, USA. ' Department of Agricultural and Resource Economics, 207 Giannini Hall, University of California, Berkeley, CA 94720–3310, USA

Abstract: The challenge for any trade agreement is to be adaptable enough to enable countries to address legitimate non-trade concerns (NTC) while being restrictive enough to limit harm to other countries and to assist the creation of free international markets. In this paper, we focus on how environmental NTC have been addressed in agricultural policy in the USA and the European Union (EU) and the resulting implications for trade agreements. For example, programmes in the USA discourage production on environmentally sensitive land, while the EU encourages extensive production. While these and other differences will affect production and trade, the different approaches to agri-environmental policy affect the degree to which the two regions can use agri-environmental policy to offset commodity payments. This difference in flexibility will, in turn, affect how easily the two regions can accept a trade agreement that mandates greater reductions in trade-distorting price supports.

Keywords: agreement on agriculture; agricultural policy; agricultural trade; conservation; environment; green-box; multifunctionality; multifunctional agriculture; agriculture negotiations; non-trade concerns; WTO; World Trade Organisation; USA; European Union; United States.

DOI: 10.1504/IJARGE.2005.007456

International Journal of Agricultural Resources, Governance and Ecology, 2005 Vol.4 No.3/4, pp.262 - 276

Published online: 22 Jul 2005 *

Full-text access for editors Full-text access for subscribers Purchase this article Comment on this article

Title: Including non-trade concerns: the environment in EU and US agricultural policy

Keep up-to-date