Title: Return or position-based value at risk?

Authors: Jérôme Huillard d'Aignaux; Benjamin Baranne; Jürgen Fuchs; Stavros Siokos

Addresses: Sciens Capital Limited, 4th Floor, 25 Berkeley Square, W1J 6HN, London, UK ' Sciens Capital Limited, 4th Floor, 25 Berkeley Square, W1J 6HN, London, UK ' Sciens Capital Limited, 4th Floor, 25 Berkeley Square, W1J 6HN, London, UK ' Sciens Capital Limited, 4th Floor, 25 Berkeley Square, W1J 6HN, London, UK

Abstract: The emergence of managed account platforms for investing in hedge funds has given the investor access to a range of new risk measures. This study analyses the accuracy of various value at risk (VaR) methodologies in the context of hedge fund investing. In our sample of data, we found that position-based VaR provides the best risk assessment measure for short horizons (up to five days). For longer term horizons (five days or more), position-based VaR can sometimes be inaccurate. Our interpretation is that, despite being based on actual underlying positions, position-based VaR is not designed to capture the dynamic of hedge fund portfolios. Over longer term horizons, VaR calculated using historic returns still provides a rough but reliable risk indicator for the investor. Our study also highlights the importance of regular monitoring of any risk model's accuracy in its specific context.

Keywords: value at risk; return-based position VaR; position-based VaR; managed account platforms; hedge funds; breach; tail event; risk measures; hedge fund investment; risk assessment.

DOI: 10.1504/IJPAM.2014.064380

International Journal of Portfolio Analysis and Management, 2014 Vol.1 No.4, pp.301 - 313

Received: 12 May 2012
Accepted: 04 Jan 2013
Published online: 30 Aug 2014 *

Full-text access for editors Full-text access for subscribers Purchase this article Comment on this article