Authors: Jayanath Ananda
Addresses: School of Business, La Trobe University, Wodonda, Victoria, Australia
Abstract: Forest policy-makers increasingly recognise the importance of public participation in planning and policy-making endeavours. In many countries, public participation has been institutionalised into national forest policy. Despite the stated policy assurances, implementing participatory approaches has been a challenging task. This paper examines the public involvement in forest policy-making, particularly focusing on the Regional Forest Agreement (RFA) programme in Australia. The RFA is regarded as the most ambitious, expensive and comprehensive resource planning exercise ever undertaken in the country. The evidence suggestes that various participatory and deliberative approaches have been used under the RFA to allow for a plurality of environmental values, but that the integration of public values into final decision-making has been unsatisfactory. Process design, commitment and inadequate attention paid to conflict resolution can be attributed as reasons for sub-optimal outcomes.
Keywords: Australia; conflict resolution; forest values; regional forest agreement; social assessment; forest policy making; public participation; public involvement; resource planning; process design; sustainable development; forest management.
International Journal of Sustainable Development, 2004 Vol.7 No.4, pp.398 - 409
Available online: 03 Mar 2005 *Full-text access for editors Access for subscribers Purchase this article Comment on this article