Title: A study on conflicts during an interdisciplinary capstone design experience

Authors: Steven R. Harper; Robert L. Nagel

Addresses: Department of Engineering, James Madison University, MSC 4113, 801 Carrier Drive, Harrisonburg, VA 22807, USA ' Department of Engineering, James Madison University, MSC 4113, 801 Carrier Drive, Harrisonburg, VA 22807, USA

Abstract: When teams are formed there is often conflict that arises. However, not all conflict is detrimental to the final deliverables of the team. Conversely, extreme presence of conflict or the wrong type of conflict is counterproductive. We studied two types of new teams. One type of new team was composed solely of students majoring in engineering, while the second type was composed of students majoring in engineering and students majoring in management. Models were fit with a superset of variables to determine the causes of task, relational, and process conflict. Our overarching goal is to understand the factors which each of the student groups perceive to cause conflict such that we can tailor our instruction toward helping the two different groups to work together as a successful project team. Among the findings are that the variables influencing the types of conflict between the two types of students are distinct.

Keywords: project management; engineering design; collaboration; task conflict; process conflict; relational conflict; engineering education; barriers; team success; teamwork; project teams; higher education; interdisciplinary teams.

DOI: 10.1504/IJCE.2014.063354

International Journal of Collaborative Engineering, 2014 Vol.1 No.3/4, pp.256 - 273

Accepted: 06 Sep 2013
Published online: 29 Jul 2014 *

Full-text access for editors Full-text access for subscribers Purchase this article Comment on this article