Title: 'Would women leaders have prevented the global financial crisis?' Teaching critical thinking by questioning a question
Authors: Julie A. Nelson
Addresses: Department of Economics, University of Massachusetts Boston, 100 Morrissey Blvd., Boston, MA 02125, USA
Abstract: 'Would having more women in leadership have prevented the financial crisis?' This question, raised in the popular media, can make effective fodder for teaching critical thinking within courses such as gender and economics, money and financial institutions, pluralist economics, or behavioural economics. While the question, as posed, demands an answer of 'Yes - sex differences in traits are important' or 'No - gender is irrelevant', students can be encouraged to question the question itself. The first part of this essay briefly reviews literature on the sameness-versus-difference debate, noting that the belief in exaggerated behavioural differences between men and women is not, in fact, empirically supported. But neither is gender irrelevant. The second part of this essay examines the important role of gender biases in the social construction of markets, and especially financial markets. Specific examples and tools that can be used when teaching about difference, similarity, and markets are discussed throughout.
Keywords: feminist economics; financial crisis; risk aversion; economics education; behavioural economics; stereotyping; gender bias; sex; financial markets; women leaders; female leaders; critical thinking; leadership.
International Journal of Pluralism and Economics Education, 2013 Vol.4 No.2, pp.192 - 209
Published online: 28 Jul 2013 *Full-text access for editors Access for subscribers Free access Comment on this article