Title: Measuring and improving the process of engineering change orders in a model-based definition context
Authors: Virgilio Quintana; Louis Rivest; Robert Pellerin
Addresses: Department of Automated Production Engineering, Ecole de technologie superieure, 1100 Notre-Dame West, Montreal, Quebec, H3C 1K3, Canada ' Department of Automated Production Engineering, Ecole de technologie superieure, 1100 Notre-Dame West, Montreal, Quebec, H3C 1K3, Canada ' Department of Mathematics and Industrial Engineering, Ecole Polytechnique de Montreal, 2500 chemin de Polytechnique, Montreal, Quebec, H3T 1J4, Canada
Abstract: The model-based definition (MBD) approach represents a trend in computer-aided design (CAD) that promises reduced time-to-market and improved product quality. Its main purpose is to enhance and accelerate the design, manufacturing and inspection of new products by integrating drawing annotations directly onto a 3D model; thereby obviating the need to generate engineering drawings. Before fully adopting this drawing-less initiative, industries must be capable of determining the gains that can potentially be obtained within each of the different product lifecycle processes that will be affected, especially within the engineering change order (ECO) process, which is based on the study, review, annotation, validation, approval and release of engineering drawings. This paper presents the results of a research project conducted to evaluate and quantify the gains of administering the ECO process in an MBD context using empirical and experimental data within a discrete-event simulation approach. Based on a case study in a Canadian aerospace company, our results show that reductions of about 11% in the average overall processing time and in the average cost can be achieved.
Keywords: engineering change order; ECO; model-based definition; MBD; engineering drawings; computer-aided design; CAD; discrete event simulation; drawing annotations; 3D modelling; Canada; aerospace industry; product design.
International Journal of Product Lifecycle Management, 2012 Vol.6 No.2, pp.138 - 160
Accepted: 08 Jul 2012
Published online: 17 Mar 2013 *