Title: The unexpressed terms of a contract

Authors: Steve Cornelius

Addresses: Department of Private Law, University of Pretoria, Pretoria 0002, South Africa

Abstract: When parties conclude a written contract, there is much which inevitably remains unsaid. Language is imprecise, with the result that the parties often express themselves in terms that are less than clear. It is also impossible to foresee all possible eventualities at the time when a contract is concluded. As a result, the laws in most jurisdictions have recognised that the express terms of a contract must be supplemented with unexpressed terms. The nature and extent of the terms vary greatly. In most Common law jurisdictions, courts have only a limited discretion to imply terms in a contract. These terms can be incidental terms which the law imports into all contracts of a particular kind. Or they can be based on the assumed or actual intention of the parties. In Civil law jurisdictions, complimentary interpretation is largely based on the significance of good faith in the law of contract and courts have a much wider discretion to compliment the terms of a contract to ensure a fair and effective contract.

Keywords: contract law; common law; good faith; consideration; unexpressed terms; implied terms; tacit terms; complimentary interpretation; written contracts; imprecise language; clarity; legal jurisdictions; express terms; courts; discretion; incidental terms; assumed intentions; actual intentions; civil law; fair contracts; effective contracts; agreement construction; private law.

DOI: 10.1504/IJPL.2012.047319

International Journal of Private Law, 2012 Vol.5 No.3, pp.293 - 302

Published online: 20 Sep 2014 *

Full-text access for editors Full-text access for subscribers Purchase this article Comment on this article