Authors: Heli Koski; Luigi Marengo; Iiro Mäkinen
Addresses: ETLA, Lönnrotinkatu 4 B, 00120 Helsinki, Finland; Scuola Superiore Sant Anna, Piazza Martiri della Libertà, 33, 56127 Pisa, Italy. ' Scuola Superiore Sant Anna, Piazza Martiri della Libertà, 33, 56127 Pisa, Italy. ' ETLA, Lönnrotinkatu 4 B, 00120 Helsinki, Finland; Stanford University, 579 Serra Mall Stanford, CA 94305-5007, USA
Abstract: In this study, we use a survey data on 398 Finnish manufacturing firms for the years 2002 and 2005 to empirically explore whether and which organisational factors explain why certain firms produce larger innovative research output than others, and whether the incentives to innovate that certain organisational practices generate differ between small and large firms, and between those firms that are operating in low-tech and high-tech industries. Our study indicates that there are vast differences in the organisational practices leading to more innovation both between small and large firms, and between the firms that operate in high- and low-tech industries. While innovation in small firms benefits from the practices that enhance employee participation in decision-making, large firms that have more decentralised decision-making patterns do not seem to innovate more than those with a more bureaucratic decision-making structure. The most efficient incentive for innovation among the sampled companies seems to be the ownership of a firm's stocks by employees and/or managers. Performance-based wages also relates positively to innovation, but only when it is combined with a systematic monitoring of the firm's performance.
Keywords: innovation; firm size; organisational practices; HRM; human resource management; managerial practices; innovativeness; Finland; manufacturing industry; organisational factors; innovative research; research outputs; R&D; research and development; incentives; large firms; small and medium-sized enterprises; SMEs; high-tech industries; low-tech industries; employee participation; decentralised decision-making; decentralisation; bureaucratic structures; bureaucracy; stock ownership; employees; managers; performance-based wages; systematic monitoring; firm performance; technology management.
International Journal of Technology Management, 2012 Vol.59 No.1/2, pp.92 - 115
Available online: 13 Jun 2012 *Full-text access for editors Access for subscribers Purchase this article Comment on this article