Title: Why do firms adopt innovations in bandwagons? Evidence of herd behaviour in open standards adoption

Authors: Sean Xin Xu; Christina Zhu; Kevin Xiaoguo Zhu

Addresses: School of Economics and Management, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China. ' Economics Department, Stanford University, Landau Economics Building, Stanford, CA 94305-6072, USA. ' The Rady School of Management, University of California, San Diego, CA 92093-0093, USA

Abstract: This study examines the bandwagon patterns of new technology adoption when firms choose to invest in internet-based, open standards networks under incomplete information. We investigate bandwagon pressure based on economic theories of network effect and herd behaviour. We further hypothesise two moderators on herd behaviour – related technology experience and market competition. Our empirical analysis of 544 firms in the financial services industry shows that a firm's adoption is positively associated with the extent of adoptions by its competitors and business partners. Furthermore, firms are more likely to imitate competitors in more competitive markets, while their related technology experience helps to mitigate such a tendency of herding. These results shed new light on the informational view of herding in innovation adoption. Firms need to take a long-term view about investing in new technology in the sense that using current technologies may serve as a stepping stone to newer technologies in the future.

Keywords: economics; corporate investment; innovation adoption; herd behaviour; network effects; new technologies; open standards; market competition; informational views; herding; financial services; bandwagons; herds; bandwagon patterns; technology adoption; internet; world wide web; networks; incomplete information; bandwagon pressure; technology experience; market competition; competitors; business partners; competitive markets; related experience; long-term views; current technologies; technology management.

DOI: 10.1504/IJTM.2012.047250

International Journal of Technology Management, 2012 Vol.59 No.1/2, pp.63 - 91

Received: 03 Jan 2011
Accepted: 24 Aug 2011
Published online: 06 Apr 2013 *

Full-text access for editors Full-text access for subscribers Purchase this article Comment on this article