Authors: Kartik Venkatraman, Nanjappa Ashwath, Ninghu Su
Addresses: Centre for Plant and Water Science, Central Queensland University, Rockhampton 4701, Queensland, Australia. ' Centre for Plant and Water Science, Central Queensland University, Rockhampton 4701, Queensland, Australia. ' School of Earth and Environmental Science, James Cook University, Cairns 4870, Queensland, Australia
Abstract: An alternative landfill capping technique called |Phytocapping| was trialled in Rockhampton, Australia. In this technique, trees were used as |bio-pumps| and |rainfall interceptors| and soil cover as the |storage| of water. The performance of this system was measured based on its ability to minimise water percolation into waste. The percolation rate was modelled using HYDRUS 1D for two main scenarios (with and without vegetation) for the thick and thin caps respectively. Results from the measurements and modelling showed that percolation rates of 16.7 mm/year in thick cover and 23.8 mm/year in thin phytocaps are markedly lower than those expected from a clay cap. Both scenarios point to one direction stating the efficiency of phytocaps in restricting water percolation into the buried waste.
Keywords: landfill capping; transpiration; canopy rainfall interception; water percolation; phytocapping; water balance; water storage; surface runoff; native trees; HYDRUS 1D; leachate.
International Journal of Environmental Technology and Management, 2011 Vol.14 No.1/2/3/4, pp.269 - 281
Published online: 29 Mar 2011 *Full-text access for editors Access for subscribers Purchase this article Comment on this article