Authors: Joseph Agassi
Addresses: Department of Philosophy, Tel-Aviv University, Rmat-Aviv, 69978 Tel-Aviv, Israel
Abstract: Classical studies describe the vital service that scientific societies rendered in the heyday of modern science. The sociology of science mostly ignores their decline, mainly because the received frameworks within which they work are too narrow to notice it: radicalism (Bacon, Descartes) and conventionalism (Duhem, Poincare) underrate the social aspect of science, whereas authoritarianism (Polanyi, Kuhn) ignores its variety. The alternative advocated here is critical rationalism (Popper); it deems rationality as limited and dependent on diverse social and individual factors, thus allowing for explanations and assessments of changes of social settings, including those of science.
Keywords: scientific societies; sociology of science; methodology; radicalism; traditionalism; normal science; scientific institutions; scientific community; scientific criticism; scientific truth; conventionalism; critical rationalism; authoritarianism.
International Journal of Technology Management, 2009 Vol.46 No.1/2, pp.180 - 194
Published online: 25 Jan 2009 *Full-text access for editors Access for subscribers Purchase this article Comment on this article