Title: Selecting and evaluating tools and methods for public participation

Authors: Jeryl L. Mumpower

Addresses: Rockefeller College of Public Affairs and Policy, University at Albany, State University of New York, 135 Western Avenue, Milne Hall Room 300, Albany, NY 12222, USA

Abstract: The proposition that greater levels of public participation would improve public decisions derives from two antecedent assumptions. The first is that the process would be improved by including persons with perspectives and knowledge that would otherwise be missing. The second is that support for adopted policies would be stronger, if the public had better information and more access to the process. How should the effectiveness of available public participation techniques be evaluated and what principles should guide prospective choices from among them? Extending Habermas|s critical theory, Renn, Webler, and Wiedemann [1] have proposed evaluating public participation methods according to whether they are fair and competent. Rohrbaugh and Quinn|s [2] Competing Values theory defines four perspectives - rational, empirical, consensual, and political - for evaluating effectiveness. Thomas [3], the International Association for Public Participation, and Resources for the Future, among others, have also proposed potential evaluative frameworks. Important potential constraints on public participation include cost, time, political support, and feasibility. Additional thorny issues include: deciding whether to include public participation as part of the policy making process; balancing a priori versus a posteriori standards of fairness; giving weight to existing versus future preferences; managing the tension between democratic and representative processes, and resolving issues of standing in disputes. The selection and evaluation of public participation techniques need to take into account their virtues and potential drawbacks, circumstantial constraints, and the relative importance of the various competing objectives of public participation processes.

Keywords: public participation; evaluation; decision making.

DOI: 10.1504/IJTPM.2001.001745

International Journal of Technology, Policy and Management, 2001 Vol.1 No.1, pp.66-77

Published online: 18 Aug 2003 *

Full-text access for editors Access for subscribers Purchase this article Comment on this article