Title: Differentiators between high and low performing manufacturing firms: an empirical study

Authors: Mile Terziovski

Addresses: Euro-Australian Cooperation Centre for Continuous Improvement and Global Innovation Management, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria 3010, Australia

Abstract: Anecdotal evidence and the limited number of empirical studies in the literature suggest considerable variability in the performance of Total Quality Management. This paper is based on a quantitative (survey) and qualitative (case study) research study that addresses the above issue by analysing 962 responses from Australian and 379 responses from New Zealand manufacturing firms. Multiple Discriminant Analysis (MDA) is used to test hypotheses and explore differences between high and low performing firms. Based on the analysis, the most significant differentiators were: the ||people-related practices|| unity of purpose and eliminated barriers between individuals and/or departments; pursuit of continuous improvement rather than ||firefighting||; and effective ||top-down|| and ||bottom-up|| communication. There is a clear message for managers that leadership, people management issues and customer focus are characteristic of high performing, best practice organisations.

Keywords: manufacturing; performance; TQM; best practice; continuous improvement; quality.

DOI: 10.1504/IJMTM.2002.001455

International Journal of Manufacturing Technology and Management, 2002 Vol.4 No.5, pp.356-371

Published online: 03 Jul 2003 *

Full-text access for editors Full-text access for subscribers Purchase this article Comment on this article