Title: The epistemology of fault tree analysis: an ethical critique

Authors: Mark Manion

Addresses: Department of English and Philosophy, Drexel University, 3141 Chestnut Street, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA

Abstract: Fault tree analysis (FTA) is one of the preeminent methods for testing the reliability, trustworthiness, and safety of engineered systems. Given their pervasiveness as a major tool for assessing the risks of technology, it is imperative that methodologies such as FTA are valid and sound. If a safety assessment based on an FTA is erroneous, the system may fail to work as expected. In this paper I submit FTA to critical scrutiny. Through a detailed step-by-step investigation, it is shown that the FTA methodology rests on numerous unproven, even false assumptions. The paper sketches out a set of ethical principles for risk assessment professionals, which, if followed, will allow them to meet their professional and ethical obligations to consider the impacts of risk on all of the stakeholders involved.

Keywords: ethical analysis; ethical responsibility; fault tree analysis; FTA; probabilistic risk assessment; professional ethics; professionalism; reliability; trustworthiness; safety; engineered systems.

DOI: 10.1504/IJRAM.2007.011990

International Journal of Risk Assessment and Management, 2007 Vol.7 No.3, pp.382 - 430

Published online: 07 Jan 2007 *

Full-text access for editors Full-text access for subscribers Purchase this article Comment on this article