Title: Theory and practice of valuation approaches in renewable energy investments: a survey among investment professionals
Authors: Christian Hürlimann; Jasim Al-Ali; Dolores S. Bengoa
Addresses: The Business School, University of Gloucestershire, The Park, Cheltenham, GL50 2RH, UK ' The Business School, University of Gloucestershire, The Park, Cheltenham, GL50 2RH, UK ' University of Applied Management Studies, Neckarauer Str. 200, 68163 Mannheim, Germany
Abstract: This paper reports the results of a survey among Swiss and German investors in renewable energy (RE) - a challenging undertaking due to the restricted data access for those typically non-trade assets. The research's focus is placed on capital budgeting techniques, risk assessment, risk mitigation, cost of capital approaches, and risk-adjustment processes. The results are both reassuring and surprising. The majority of organisations still employ well-established discounted cash flow based techniques while other approaches propagated in finance theory, such as the certainty equivalent method, are seldom applied. A surprising number of organisations still use their firm's risk within discount rates in RE valuations instead of project risk. Beside of taking systematic risk into account in line with the capital asset pricing model, various diversifiable unsystematic risk components are considered in RE valuation. We also find clear evidence about materialised risk influencing personal risk preferences and some evidence about cultural differences in valuation.
Keywords: capital budgeting; asset pricing; investment return; cost of capital; risk assessment; risk mitigation; project risk; risk-adjustment; non-traded assets; private equity; renewable energy; Switzerland; Germany; benchmarking.
World Review of Entrepreneurship, Management and Sustainable Development, 2019 Vol.15 No.5, pp.589 - 643
Available online: 06 Nov 2019 *Full-text access for editors Access for subscribers Purchase this article Comment on this article