Title: The profound implications of continuing to teach 'supply and demand' instead of 'demand and cost' in intro economics courses - an unequal exchange application

Authors: Ron Baiman

Addresses: Goodwin Hall 369, Graduate Business Administration, Benedictine University, 5700 College Road, Lisle, IL 60532, USA

Abstract: This paper focuses on how two iconic memes of neoclassical (NC) introductory economics provide the ideological basis for the neoliberal perfectly competitive free market (PCFM) and free trade (FT) economic doctrines. The paper argues that the supply and demand (SDM) and Ricardian comparative advantage (RCA) memes that ostensibly support these doctrines are fundamentally in error both economically and logically, and should be replaced in introductory economics teaching by demand and cost (DCM) and unequal exchange (UE) memes, respectively. The DCM is explained in detail and used to analyse all situations to which the SDM is usually applied. The UE meme, within a DCM framework, is then used to derive principles for fair and sustainable international trade and finance. The paper shows that the DCM and UE memes provide more realistic, equitable, and sustainable views of production and international economies than the fictional SDM and RCA memes, which have become ubiquitous, even in heterodox textbooks.

Keywords: supply and demand; SDM; demand and cost; DCM; introductory economics teaching; neoclassical economics; unequal exchange; Ricardian comparative advantage; RCA; free trade; economic memes.

DOI: 10.1504/IJPEE.2019.101728

International Journal of Pluralism and Economics Education, 2019 Vol.10 No.2, pp.171 - 189

Accepted: 15 Mar 2018
Published online: 15 Aug 2019 *

Full-text access for editors Access for subscribers Purchase this article Comment on this article