Title: Evaluating skills of a fencing coach: an AHP approach

Authors: Charikleia Karakosta; Sotirios Sotiras; Theodosios Palaskas

Addresses: Energy Policy Unit (EPU-NTUA), Decision Support Systems Laboratory, School of Electrical and Computer Engineering, National Technical University of Athens, 9. Iroon Polytechniou Str., 157 80, Athens, Greece; Department of Business Administration, University of West Attica, Petrou Ralli & Thivon 250, 12244 Egaleo, Greece ' Panteion University of Social and Political Sciences, 29 Aristotelous Street, Athens, 17671, Greece ' Panteion University of Social and Political Sciences, 29 Aristotelous Street, Athens, 17671, Greece

Abstract: The role of a fencing coach is complex, requiring a balance of soft skills and technical expertise to meet athletes' evolving needs. Given the demanding nature of competitive fencing, selecting the most suitable coach is critical for optimising performance and fostering physical and mental well-being. This study develops a methodological framework using the analytic hierarchy process (AHP) to evaluate fencing coach selection criteria across an athlete's age categories. By analysing factors prioritised by athletes during different career phases, the framework aids decision-makers in identifying key competencies - such as communication, technical knowledge, and adaptability - that align with developmental stages. Results highlight opportunities to enhance coaching skills and improve team management strategies tailored to athletes' age-specific requirements. The findings offer actionable insights for clubs and institutions to refine coach recruitment, training, and support systems, ensuring coaches effectively nurture athlete potential from youth to elite levels while fostering long-term engagement in the sport.

Keywords: effective sports team management; decision making; coach selection; multi-criteria decision making; MCDM; analytic hierarchy process; AHP; fencing.

DOI: 10.1504/IJMCDM.2025.150305

International Journal of Multicriteria Decision Making, 2025 Vol.10 No.2, pp.157 - 183

Received: 07 Feb 2025
Accepted: 26 May 2025
Published online: 08 Dec 2025 *

Full-text access for editors Full-text access for subscribers Purchase this article Comment on this article