The information content of the VDAX volatility index and backtesting daily value-at-risk models
by Ihsan Ullah Badshah
International Journal of Financial Markets and Derivatives (IJFMD), Vol. 4, No. 3/4, 2015

Abstract: This paper examines the information content of the new VDAX volatility index to forecast daily value-at-risk (VaR) estimates and compares its VaR forecasts with the VaR forecasts of the asymmetric GARCH model of Glosten, Jagannathan and Runkle (GJR) (1993) and RiskMetrics model. The performance of the daily VaR models is evaluated both in-sample and out-of-sample using unconditional coverage, independence, and conditional coverage tests. We find that the information content of implied volatility is superior to that of historical volatility for the daily VaR forecasts of a portfolio of the DAX 30 stock index. Backtesting results suggest the following rank for our VaR models, from best to worst, GJR-GARCH(1, 1) augmented with implied volatility, implied volatility, GJR-GARCH(1, 1), and RiskMetrics. Our findings have implications for traders, risk managers and regulators.

Online publication date: Wed, 09-Dec-2015

The full text of this article is only available to individual subscribers or to users at subscribing institutions.

 
Existing subscribers:
Go to Inderscience Online Journals to access the Full Text of this article.

Pay per view:
If you are not a subscriber and you just want to read the full contents of this article, buy online access here.

Complimentary Subscribers, Editors or Members of the Editorial Board of the International Journal of Financial Markets and Derivatives (IJFMD):
Login with your Inderscience username and password:

Username:        Password:          Forgotten your password?

Want to subscribe?
A subscription gives you complete access to all articles in the current issue, as well as to all articles in the previous three years (where applicable). See our Orders page to subscribe.

If you still need assistance, please email subs@inderscience.com