Patent strategies for ensuring the appropriability of innovation: case studies of inkjet printers and DVD drives Online publication date: Mon, 19-Oct-2015
by Yoshimasa Goto; Kiminori Gemba; Shuichi Ishida
International Journal of Business and Systems Research (IJBSR), Vol. 9, No. 4, 2015
Abstract: In most markets, essential patents may not help patentees to dominate the market because a single product involves many essential patents, which are distributed among many companies; this allows many companies to enter the market. In the inkjet printer and DVD drive markets, however, essential patent holders have succeeded in dominating the market. This paper describes the patent strategies that inkjet printer companies and DVD drive companies have used to ensure the appropriability of innovation. Canon, Epson, and Hewlett-Packard licensed their essential patents only among themselves and did not license these patents to other companies. This strategy allowed these companies to monopolise the licenses of the essential patents and to dominate the market. The five subsidiaries of the six main DVD standard essential patent holders succeeded in avoiding the payment of expensive patent royalty, which served as a barrier against their competitors. This strategy allowed them to dominate the DVD drive market successfully.
Existing subscribers:
Go to Inderscience Online Journals to access the Full Text of this article.
If you are not a subscriber and you just want to read the full contents of this article, buy online access here.Complimentary Subscribers, Editors or Members of the Editorial Board of the International Journal of Business and Systems Research (IJBSR):
Login with your Inderscience username and password:
Want to subscribe?
A subscription gives you complete access to all articles in the current issue, as well as to all articles in the previous three years (where applicable). See our Orders page to subscribe.
If you still need assistance, please email subs@inderscience.com