Two perspectives of time in economics: the neoclassical school (Newtonian) versus the Austrian school (Bergsonian) Online publication date: Sat, 16-Aug-2014
by Fu-Lai Tony Yu
International Journal of Pluralism and Economics Education (IJPEE), Vol. 3, No. 1, 2012
Abstract: This paper has two objectives. Firstly, it compares the concept of time in two economic paradigms, the neoclassical and the Austrian school. Secondly, this paper traces the development of the concept of subjective time in the Austrian School of Economics from Carl Menger to the contemporary Austrian economists. The neoclassical school uses a Newtonian time concept in which time is homogeneous, mathematically discontinuous and causal inertia, while most Austrian economists adopt Henri Bergson's concept of time, where time is subjective and continuous, meaning that events are linked with each other. This implies that an individual's decision will affect on the future, an effect which is unpredictable. Illustrations on the usefulness of the subjective time in understanding human action and economic phenomena are given. This paper concludes that it is more fruitful to use Bergsonian time than Newtonian time in economic research.
Existing subscribers:
Go to Inderscience Online Journals to access the Full Text of this article.
If you are not a subscriber and you just want to read the full contents of this article, buy online access here.Complimentary Subscribers, Editors or Members of the Editorial Board of the International Journal of Pluralism and Economics Education (IJPEE):
Login with your Inderscience username and password:
Want to subscribe?
A subscription gives you complete access to all articles in the current issue, as well as to all articles in the previous three years (where applicable). See our Orders page to subscribe.
If you still need assistance, please email subs@inderscience.com
Our Blog 
Follow us on Twitter 
Visit us on Facebook