Contractor-furnished compaction testing: searching for correlations between potential alternatives to the nuclear density gauge in Missouri highway projects Online publication date: Tue, 20-Mar-2018
by Kevin W. McLain; Douglas D. Gransberg
International Journal of Quality and Innovation (IJQI), Vol. 3, No. 2/3/4, 2017
Abstract: The Missouri Department of Transportation's (MoDOT) past and present quality control and quality assurance programs for construction are examined. MoDOT's present quality management program along with a small number of grading projects has lowered the number of quality assurance (QA) soil compaction tests completed in the past two years. The department would like to rid itself of using the nuclear density gauges because of burdensome federal regulations, required training, security and licensing fees. Linear and multiple regression analysis was performed to see if a correlation between nuclear density gauge dry densities values and light weight deflectometer modulus values/clegg hammer clegg impact values exist. These relationships or lack thereof will determine the technology used by construction contractors to perform compaction quality control testing if MoDOT moves away from using nuclear density gauges for soil density verification.
Existing subscribers:
Go to Inderscience Online Journals to access the Full Text of this article.
If you are not a subscriber and you just want to read the full contents of this article, buy online access here.Complimentary Subscribers, Editors or Members of the Editorial Board of the International Journal of Quality and Innovation (IJQI):
Login with your Inderscience username and password:
Want to subscribe?
A subscription gives you complete access to all articles in the current issue, as well as to all articles in the previous three years (where applicable). See our Orders page to subscribe.
If you still need assistance, please email subs@inderscience.com
Our Blog 
Follow us on Twitter 
Visit us on Facebook