Readability of compensation discussion and analysis: the impact of the Plain English initiative
by Xuan Huang; Sudha Krishnan; Ping Lin
International Journal of Services and Standards (IJSS), Vol. 11, No. 1, 2016

Abstract: After the initial requirement of compensation discussion and analysis (CD&A) in proxy documents, SEC reviewed 350 companies' CD&A in 2007 and reported lack of readability and clarity in this document. Hence we examined the readability measures of CD&A from 2007 to 2013. We also compared the CD&A to the 'letter to the shareholders' and the management discussion and analysis (MD&A) of annual report in 2012 for the differences in readability. As expected, the CD&A was less readable than the letter to shareholders, but more readable than MD&A. We also found that although year-to-year change in readability was small, readability of CD&A had improved significantly over the years. In addition, we found that the higher the excess CEO compensation, the more readable the CD&A, providing evidence for the litigation and legitimacy theories.

Online publication date: Thu, 09-Jun-2016

The full text of this article is only available to individual subscribers or to users at subscribing institutions.

 
Existing subscribers:
Go to Inderscience Online Journals to access the Full Text of this article.

Pay per view:
If you are not a subscriber and you just want to read the full contents of this article, buy online access here.

Complimentary Subscribers, Editors or Members of the Editorial Board of the International Journal of Services and Standards (IJSS):
Login with your Inderscience username and password:

Username:        Password:          Forgotten your password?

Want to subscribe?
A subscription gives you complete access to all articles in the current issue, as well as to all articles in the previous three years (where applicable). See our Orders page to subscribe.

If you still need assistance, please email subs@inderscience.com