Stuck in the middle: the need to refine intermediary liability for copyright infringement in the P2P file-sharing world Online publication date: Sat, 20-Sep-2014
by Helen Paterson
International Journal of Technology Policy and Law (IJTPL), Vol. 1, No. 1, 2012
Abstract: With the realisation that suing millions of primary infringers is relatively ineffective, the fight against online copyright piracy has turned its attention to the intermediaries who provide the tools enabling infringement. Unfortunately, the potential side effect of discouraging innovation in dissemination technologies with legitimate functions is largely ignored. This paper considers this issue from an Australian perspective, arguing that the current approach to intermediary liability for copyright infringement, 'authorising' infringement, is not achieving an appropriate balance between protecting the interests of copyright proprietors and encouraging technological innovation. It uses a case study on the hypothetical liability of BitTorrent, Inc. and the creator of the BitTorrent protocol to demonstrate this imbalance. The paper then attempts to address this issue, analysing how Australia's copyright law should be refined to ensure it does not stifle innovation in technology with beneficial, legitimate uses.
Existing subscribers:
Go to Inderscience Online Journals to access the Full Text of this article.
If you are not a subscriber and you just want to read the full contents of this article, buy online access here.Complimentary Subscribers, Editors or Members of the Editorial Board of the International Journal of Technology Policy and Law (IJTPL):
Login with your Inderscience username and password:
Want to subscribe?
A subscription gives you complete access to all articles in the current issue, as well as to all articles in the previous three years (where applicable). See our Orders page to subscribe.
If you still need assistance, please email subs@inderscience.com
Our Blog 
Follow us on Twitter 
Visit us on Facebook