Proposing a comprehensive and hierarchic framework for prioritising Isfahan brands using AHP and TOPSIS approaches Online publication date: Thu, 28-Nov-2013
by Arash Shahin; Masoud Pourhamidi
International Journal of Applied Decision Sciences (IJADS), Vol. 6, No. 2, 2013
Abstract: In this paper, a comprehensive framework of assessing brands with a hierarchy of effective indicators has been developed and proposed. The proposed framework has been used in prioritising registered brands of Isfahan by the use of multiple criteria decision making techniques, based on the views of a team of experts. The team has determined the importance and weight of each indicator using AHP technique. Questionnaire, interview, brands' documents, and Delphi method have been used for data collection. Comparative analysis and multiple criteria decision-making (MCDM) are used for analysing the collected data. The survey process has been designed in six phases and by applying TOPSIS method on obtained data from organisations, 76 brands of Isfahan province have been ranked. Findings imply that steel companies have the highest ranks among the studied brands.
Online publication date: Thu, 28-Nov-2013
If you are not a subscriber and you just want to read the full contents of this article, buy online access here.Complimentary Subscribers, Editors or Members of the Editorial Board of the International Journal of Applied Decision Sciences (IJADS):
Login with your Inderscience username and password:
Want to subscribe?
A subscription gives you complete access to all articles in the current issue, as well as to all articles in the previous three years (where applicable). See our Orders page to subscribe.
If you still need assistance, please email email@example.com