Turbulence closure in atmospheric circulation model and its influence on the dispersion Online publication date: Mon, 11-Jan-2010
by S. Alessandrini, E. Ferrero, C. Pertot, S. Trini Castelli, E. Orlandi
International Journal of Environment and Pollution (IJEP), Vol. 40, No. 1/2/3, 2010
Abstract: In this work the comparisons between measured and numerically simulated tracer experiments are presented for two different datasets. Different versions of the model system RMS, including the Regional Atmospheric Modelling System (RAMS) and the dispersion model SPRAY, accounting for alternative turbulence closures are used. These last are the Mellor and Yamada model level 2.5 and two versions of the E-l model, the standard isotropic and anisotropic versions. Moreover, simulations performed with the CALPUFF dispersion model coupled with RAMS are also presented. The wind fields and the ground level concentrations produced by the two model systems are shown and compared.
Existing subscribers:
Go to Inderscience Online Journals to access the Full Text of this article.
If you are not a subscriber and you just want to read the full contents of this article, buy online access here.Complimentary Subscribers, Editors or Members of the Editorial Board of the International Journal of Environment and Pollution (IJEP):
Login with your Inderscience username and password:
Want to subscribe?
A subscription gives you complete access to all articles in the current issue, as well as to all articles in the previous three years (where applicable). See our Orders page to subscribe.
If you still need assistance, please email subs@inderscience.com