Comparisons of models with data: effects of averaging time as indicated by sonic anemometer measurements Online publication date: Thu, 17-Sep-2009
by R.E. Lewis, T.B. Staples, J.O. Lewis
International Journal of Environment and Pollution (IJEP), Vol. 5, No. 4/5/6, 1995
Abstract: For continuous sources, plots of predicted against observed gas concentrations often display considerable scatter. These differences are apparent even when the averaging times for the models and data match. Possible sources of error in the observations are shifts in direction of the mean wind or disturbance by intermediate- and large-scale eddies. Errors in predictions may arise from the selection of a specific value for a dispersion parameter, such as the standard deviation of the lateral wind fluctuations. Although usually assumed constant over the period during which gas concentrations are measured, this particular parameter may vary significantly. Especially interesting was the finding that the magnitude of this parameter is particularly sensitive to averaging time when conditions are stable, implying that errors in predicted concentrations could be significant if the model averaging time differs from that of the observations. These aspects are discussed in the light of measurements made with a sonic anemometer on an industrial site.
Existing subscribers:
Go to Inderscience Online Journals to access the Full Text of this article.
If you are not a subscriber and you just want to read the full contents of this article, buy online access here.Complimentary Subscribers, Editors or Members of the Editorial Board of the International Journal of Environment and Pollution (IJEP):
Login with your Inderscience username and password:
Want to subscribe?
A subscription gives you complete access to all articles in the current issue, as well as to all articles in the previous three years (where applicable). See our Orders page to subscribe.
If you still need assistance, please email subs@inderscience.com