A corpus-based computational analysis of philosophical texts: comparing analytic and continental philosophy Online publication date: Sun, 25-Jun-2017
by Thorsten Botz-Bornstein; Mohamed M. Mostafa
International Journal of Social and Humanistic Computing (IJSHC), Vol. 2, No. 3/4, 2017
Abstract: This is the first modern quantitative study of philosophical texts using corpus linguistics. We compared two sets of texts consisting of ten texts of analytic philosophy and ten texts of continental philosophy by using the Burrows delta consensus tree, principal components analysis, as well as multidimensional scaling (MDS) and cluster analysis. We used a supplementary corpus of ten analytical texts pertaining to film studies. The analysis shows that analytic and continental texts are clearly distinct in stylistic terms though there are divisions within the continental corpus. The results lead to the conclusion that philosophical thought is dependent on language. The introduction of an analytic philosophy of film corpus shows that the focus on a certain topic fractures the linguistic coherence of analytic philosophy. Our focus on two major philosophical schools makes it possible to generalise findings to other philosophical schools.
Online publication date: Sun, 25-Jun-2017
If you are not a subscriber and you just want to read the full contents of this article, buy online access here.Complimentary Subscribers, Editors or Members of the Editorial Board of the International Journal of Social and Humanistic Computing (IJSHC):
Login with your Inderscience username and password:
Want to subscribe?
A subscription gives you complete access to all articles in the current issue, as well as to all articles in the previous three years (where applicable). See our Orders page to subscribe.
If you still need assistance, please email email@example.com