The new CPF Life plans as portfolios Online publication date: Mon, 05-Dec-2016
by Boon Seng Tan
International Journal of Public Policy (IJPP), Vol. 13, No. 1/2, 2017
Abstract: We examined the new CPF Life plans - the standard (default) and basic plans - as portfolios of a bond and an obligation to purchase an annuity. This perspective, in contrast to the view that these plans are just annuities, shows that the mandatory scheme does not have universal coverage even for those who are mandated into the scheme, and there are subtle cross subsidies among groups. The basic plan offers real choice for CPF members to substantially reduce further annuitisation by reducing the annuity component of the portfolio and exiting the plan because of the long vesting age. We estimated the money's worth ratio (MWR) of the plans and found that they were not sustainable at the current payouts (1.14 < MWR < 1.93) consistent with previous estimation of earlier plans replaced by the current ones. We predict the payouts will trend downwards after 2023 (the years the first cohort's annuity plans are executed) because the generous MWR are not sustainable. This paper contributes to policy debate about the coverage of the mandatory scheme and the wealth transfer between the insurer and annuitants. Policy questions about wealth transfer among annuitants, and the welfare effect of introducing the scheme, require further research.
Online publication date: Mon, 05-Dec-2016
If you are not a subscriber and you just want to read the full contents of this article, buy online access here.Complimentary Subscribers, Editors or Members of the Editorial Board of the International Journal of Public Policy (IJPP):
Login with your Inderscience username and password:
Want to subscribe?
A subscription gives you complete access to all articles in the current issue, as well as to all articles in the previous three years (where applicable). See our Orders page to subscribe.
If you still need assistance, please email firstname.lastname@example.org