The interpretation differences of verbal probability expressions in principles-based accounting standards: evidence from China Online publication date: Thu, 21-Jul-2016
by Fengchun Tang; Ling Yang
International Journal of Accounting, Auditing and Performance Evaluation (IJAAPE), Vol. 12, No. 3, 2016
Abstract: This study examines whether verbal probability expressions (VPEs) in principles-based accounting standards are understood and interpreted consistently by Chinese accounting professionals and students. We gathered data from auditors working in Chinese public accounting firms, accounting professionals not employed by Chinese public accounting firms, and Chinese accounting students. The results indicate that Chinese auditors exhibit a high degree of consensus in their VPE interpretations. However, preparer and student interpretations tend to vary more and exhibit lower levels of consensus. In addition, there are evidences showing that small differences in the translation of VPEs can have a significant unintended impact on the interpretations of these expressions in accounting standards.
Online publication date: Thu, 21-Jul-2016
If you are not a subscriber and you just want to read the full contents of this article, buy online access here.Complimentary Subscribers, Editors or Members of the Editorial Board of the International Journal of Accounting, Auditing and Performance Evaluation (IJAAPE):
Login with your Inderscience username and password:
Want to subscribe?
A subscription gives you complete access to all articles in the current issue, as well as to all articles in the previous three years (where applicable). See our Orders page to subscribe.
If you still need assistance, please email email@example.com