When asset management and organisations meet: accounting for employee experiences Online publication date: Tue, 22-Mar-2016
by Daan F.J. Schraven; Andreas Hartmann; Geert P.M.R. Dewulf
International Journal of Strategic Engineering Asset Management (IJSEAM), Vol. 2, No. 4, 2015
Abstract: For some time, organisations have encountered challenges when implementing asset management, particularly when closing the gap between how the asset management is understood by employees and how they support it in practice. Maturity models, common applied evaluations for implementing asset management, have so far only addressed the extent to which implemented asset management matches prescriptive standards. In this paper, we argue that, beside the value of maturity evaluations, shortcomings of maturity models remain in accounting for employee experiences with specific operational characteristics that challenge implementation. We then offer a criteria-free, employee-based approach to complement maturity models known as Rumelt's tests. By applying this approach to the case of a Dutch transportation agency, we show how employees understand the organisation's strategy behind asset management and how they coordinate asset management activities in practice.
Online publication date: Tue, 22-Mar-2016
If you are not a subscriber and you just want to read the full contents of this article, buy online access here.Complimentary Subscribers, Editors or Members of the Editorial Board of the International Journal of Strategic Engineering Asset Management (IJSEAM):
Login with your Inderscience username and password:
Want to subscribe?
A subscription gives you complete access to all articles in the current issue, as well as to all articles in the previous three years (where applicable). See our Orders page to subscribe.
If you still need assistance, please email firstname.lastname@example.org