Layered evaluation of adaptive learning systems Online publication date: Sun, 28-Nov-2004
by Peter Brusilovsky, Charalampos Karagiannidis, Demetrios Sampson
International Journal of Continuing Engineering Education and Life-Long Learning (IJCEELL), Vol. 14, No. 4/5, 2004
Abstract: This paper suggests an alternative to the traditional ''as a whole'' approach of evaluating adaptive learning systems (ALS), and adaptive systems, in general. We argue that the commonly recognised models of adaptive systems can be used as a basis for a layered evaluation that offers certain benefits to the developers of ALS. Therefore, we propose the layered evaluation framework, where the success of adaptation is addressed at two distinct layers: user modelling and adaptation decision making. We outline how layered evaluation can improve the current evaluation practice of ALS. To build a stronger case for a layered evaluation, we re-visit the evaluation of the InterBook where the layered approach can provide a difference and provide an example of its use in KOD learning system.
Online publication date: Sun, 28-Nov-2004
If you are not a subscriber and you just want to read the full contents of this article, buy online access here.Complimentary Subscribers, Editors or Members of the Editorial Board of the International Journal of Continuing Engineering Education and Life-Long Learning (IJCEELL):
Login with your Inderscience username and password:
Want to subscribe?
A subscription gives you complete access to all articles in the current issue, as well as to all articles in the previous three years (where applicable). See our Orders page to subscribe.
If you still need assistance, please email email@example.com